It is the dissent that seeks to overturn precedent by resurrecting Roberts a mere five years after it was rejected in Crawford.
27 January 2010
Constitutional Law in a Nutshell
From Justice Scalia's opinion in the 2009 case of Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts. The facts of the case are irrelevant. This priceless gem of legal reasoning stands on its own. I can only wonder if Scalia has any sense of irony.
Labels:
Constitutional Law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment